OpenViBE Bug Tracker - openvibe
View Issue Details
0000191openvibefeature requestpublic2017-08-03 08:562017-09-06 11:28
brylie 
 
normalminorhave not tried
newopen 
0000191: [Meta] Align with BigEEG workflow standards
The BigEEG project is developing standards and methods for large-scale EEG analysis.

http://www.bigeeg.org/ [^]

This issue is intended to serve as a basis of discussion and planning around the idea of supporting BigEEG standards in OpenViBE.

What are some considerations and related OpenViBE components that are relevant to the BigEEG project?
No tags attached.
png Big EEG Detailed - Detailed-small2.png (67,983) 2017-09-06 10:37
http://openvibe.inria.fr/tracker/file_download.php?file_id=47&type=bug
png
Issue History
2017-08-03 08:56brylieNew Issue
2017-09-06 10:36jtlindgrNote Added: 0001258
2017-09-06 10:37jtlindgrFile Added: Big EEG Detailed - Detailed-small2.png
2017-09-06 11:28brylieNote Added: 0001259

Notes
(0001258)
jtlindgr   
2017-09-06 10:36   
By a glance at the image on the web page (took liberty to attach it), it looks like there's at least two points where connections could be made,

1) Make OpenViBE read and/or write XDF files
2) Make OpenViBE work with data having HED tags

The first would allow OpenViBE to work on and to produce data compatible with the framework ('recording setup' stage; although if BigEEG already reads other file formats, it could be that data exportation from OV already works.

The utility of the second option is not that clear to me without reading the proposal, i.e. what would OV signal processing get in addition to the usual eeg markers (what does data curation stage do)?

Basically its also a question of use cases: what would be wished of OpenViBE? Perhaps this is also your question. One thing that OV can do in a sense is to provide alternative to the 'single study' option (on the right in the schematic figure on the bigeeg page); we can run OV classification pipelines on such data and see what kind of BCI accuracies would be reached.

The users more knowledgeable with BigEEG could propose other roles OV could do. Perhaps the forum would be a better place to propose/discuss/understand these.
(0001259)
brylie   
2017-09-06 11:28   
> if BigEEG already reads other file formats, it could be that data exportation from OV already works.

It is worth mentioning that some of the principle stakeholders behind BigEEG are also contributors to LabStreamingLayer:

https://github.com/sccn/labstreaminglayer [^]